Specifically I was wondering about this question.
It is definitely economics related, but once one writes down some equations it seems more like a computer science problem.
Economics continues to wed itself to statistical programming and fluency with R, Python, or some other language to do macro based problems. A question about programming a neoclassical growth model will definitely have relevance for future users of this site, and though it doesn't ask any explicit questions about the model itself and is, as you say, mostly a computer science question, I think a good answer to this question can highlight how to ensure the code for the model make economic sense. That is, it can actually solve it in a reasonable manner.
As you brought up in the comments, the form of utility and production matters. Particularly, we want to ensure the model has a solution and justify why we put certain constraints on some functional forms, and that is something that is relevant to economics. Code for this finite horizon problem might also use Euler equations, or a dynamic programming method, and that is relevant enough math for an economics problem. So that's my rough reasoning for why I'd say the question is on-topic.
Mathematics, numerical programming, statistics and software implementations of techniques from these fields of knowledge are all an integral part of economic theory and method. I think anyone who wants to spend their time here on earth contemplating these matters deserves to be welcomed here.
For the particular problem I tried to argue that the economics of the problem mattered. Offcourse once Tara has gone from economic model to choice of algorithm to solve for equilibrium one could argue that there is nothing particularly 'economic' about the algorithm. Which is true - but it is also reductionism from a scientific point of view. When she comes back with some R code and faces a problem we could brush her off saying: oh this is just code not really anything to do with economics.
I think that would be unfortunate.
It is not about the algorithm or the code in itself but about establishing that this algorithm and software implementation can be used to solve this problem arising in economics and then going on to actually doing it. It is the why, the how and for what the algorithm is used that makes its a brilliant example of economic scientific method. Set up model, formulate equilibrium conditions, choose solution method and finally implement it succesfully.
Why would we rob ourselves of having an example of such a proces on this site even if at an introductory level? To me it seems like a good example of why mathematics, numerical algorithms and computer programming are important for economics.
"To harness the full power of computer technology, economists need to use a broad range of mathematical techniques. In this book, Kenneth Judd presents techniques from the numerical analysis and applied mathematics literatures and shows how to use them in economic analyses" Showing how to use math and programming to solve economic problems is contributing to economic scientific method.
Mathematics has not always enjoyed the place it holds today in economics but hey with general equilibrium theory who is going to argue against the importance of math for economics. So we accept question solving for Marshall demand function although offcourse it is "only math".
Statistics has also become integral part of economics much through the development of the field of econometrics. So we accept questions on choice of statistical methods we just call it 'econometrics' because then it is ok to do it as an economist.
What is the word for programs and code when used for economic problems? Do we need one in order to accept the relevance of 'code' within economic method instead of interpreting 'code' in the reductionist sense of 'just code'.
We all know that software today is important. There are several R packages or stata packages that are written by economist for economists using theory and methods developed and published in journals within the field of economics.
So in conclusion I hope that the community of moderators will choose to display a tolerant policy when it comes to questions involving programming. I would hate for EconomicsBeta to end up having just as bad reviews as StackOverflow have on Trustpilot [https://www.trustpilot.com/review/stackoverflow.com]. I realize it is small sample but I recognize picture it paints.